|
25
October 2003 Galloway's Expulsion
Sir,
Galloway's Expulsion
You report (News,
Oct 23) that George Galloway accuses Labour of staging a
"political show trial". It is not a show trial, but a
hearing before the National Constitutional Committee of the Labour
Party, convened as a disciplinary case, and following a clear set
of procedural guidelines and precedents evolved over 100 years.
The procedures are published in and form part of the Labour Party
rule book and are available for all members to see on the Labour
Party website.
Mr Galloway is being accused of indiscipline under rule 2A.8,
which says: "No member of the party shall engage in conduct
which in the opinion of the NCC is prejudicial, or in any act
which in the opinion of the NCC is grossly detrimental to the
party."
According to previous reports, Mr Galloway's defence will be to
claim his fundamental right to freedom of speech. And we are told
that he also seeks to rely on a separate reference in Labour Party
rule 2A.8: "The National Constitution Committee shall not
have regard to the mere holding or expression of beliefs and
opinions."
The issue would seem to be whether the right to free speech, a
right all citizens share and one regulated by the Human Rights
Act, was intended to apply to all members of the Labour Party in
connection with their obligations as members.
If the right to free expression should extend to all members of
all political parties, and a political party has no right to
determine for itself what is acceptable in terms of that
expression, then the whole basis of effective political
association is undermined.
From:
- Mike Allott
-
Eastleigh
-
Hants
-
--------------------------
see this letter online at:
www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/letters/3598045/Political-expression.html
|